The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the average weekly expenditure of families for food, housing, fuel and power, clothing and footwear, household goods, personal goods, transport and leisure for the year of 1968 and 2018. Overall, Food, Fuel and Power, Clothing and Footwear, Personal goods experience a decline whereas remaining sectors follow a increasing trend.

In 1968, among all, most of the money was invested to buy food which equals almost 35% of total expense. Whereas, the expense of Fuel and Power was the lowest indicating 7% of the full income. In the other segments, the amount of expense for Housing, Clothing and footwear, Household goods, personal goods, Transport and Leisure was almost same indicating a value approximately in between 9 to 10% in every case.

Meanwhile in 2018, The expense for food decreased dramatically to half the value of 1968 leveling to almost 17% of the actual cost. Moreover, cost of Fuel and power, clothing and footwear, personal goods also declined to lower value. On the other hand, the expense related to Housing, Leisure and Transport increase significantly. Specifically, The cost involve in leisure almost tripled to a value of about 23% as compared with the cost of same in 1968.

In conclusion, the average weekly spending in 1968 and 2018 by family in certain country for some sectors followed increasing pattern while decreasing pattern was observed in other areas. Only exception was household goods which remained same in both those time periods.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-05 hinhin411 view
2023-09-03 hinhin411 view
2023-09-03 hinhin411 view
2023-07-05 adnanmahathir84 11 view
2022-11-03 nvtrung309 84 view
Essays by user adnanmahathir84 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd Footwear, Personal goods experience a decline whereas remaining sectors follow...
^^
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ecline whereas remaining sectors follow a increasing trend. In 1968, among al...
^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, personal goods, Transport and Leisure was almost same indicating a value appro...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...y in between 9 to 10% in every case. Meanwhile in 2018, The expense for food decreased...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lined to lower value. On the other hand, the expense related to Housing, Leisure ...
^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in leisure almost tripled to a value of about 23% as compared with the cost of ...
^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... about 23% as compared with the cost of same in 1968. In conclusion, the ave...
^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ertain country for some sectors followed increasing pattern while decreasing patt...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22727272727 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6577187634 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504132231405 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4961503442 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0765665998457 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310332386051 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403062497797 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0540922245103 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274345458277 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.