The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
The bar chart compares the distribution of family earnings in one week between 1968 and 2018. From an overall perspective, the percentage of food expenditures compared to the total sum dropped significantly, whereas leisure expenses increased by the greatest margin.
Looking at the figures in 1968, spendings on food evidently take up the largest proportion of overall payments, standing at 35%. Money spent on fuel and power was the lowest in that year with only 6%. Expenditures on household goods, personal goods and transport were level at 8%. Finally, 10% and 9% of income in a week were distributed to housing and leisure respectively.
Turning to the figures in 2018, leisure spendings increased the most by 17%. Money allocated to residential aspects also experienced a significant increase, from 10% to 18%. Conversely, food spendings plunged to 17% from 35%, which was only half the amount as it was in 1968. The sum spent on transportation increased by 6% to 14%. The remaining four areas of expenditures did not experience such obvious changes, with the difference between the two yeas no more than 5%. Noticeably, the percentage on money on household goods purchased remained the same at 6%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Only movies that can teach us something about real life is worth watching 56
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 78
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16243654822 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00890653124 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61421319797 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0948370134 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.75 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130642364647 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522152786171 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828017118702 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975646796927 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497716313261 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16243654822 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00890653124 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61421319797 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0948370134 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.75 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130642364647 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522152786171 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828017118702 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975646796927 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497716313261 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.