The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of families' weekly spent income in eight distinct groups in one country in 1968 and 2018.
In general, by 2018 people did not tend to spend their money in food groups and it reduced significantly.
As can be seen, there were different types of subjects that families spent their money them during the week. There was an increase in three housing, transport, and leisure groups in 2018 which was about 8%, 5%, and 13%. Although the household goods group did not change in 1968 and 2018, food, fuel and power, clothing and footware, and personal goods decreased in 2018. Among these four groups, food was approximately 18% drop, and the other three groups no longer significant. The people allocated most of their money to housing and leisure by falling into the food group.
As a result, families changed their classifications spent money in 2018, and had more like to leisure and housing by dropping it in the food group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with prediction for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison 73
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research that 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86060606061 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50079142661 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.3870930002 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.25 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170371741435 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863689181178 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072566139925 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131358712342 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731515613742 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.