In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others.
Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion?
These days, with the development of information technology, it is undeniable that shopping, working, and communicating with people via the Internet are more convenient than face-to-face communication. People believe that it is unnecessary to live in traditional ways. In my opinion, this modification can lead to several negative effects for the following reasons.
On the first hand, shopping, working and communicating online are convenient and save time for people. People may have more time to do whatever they want. For example, instead of taking time for an hour at the shop just to buy small items, customers can stay at the home, office, or anywhere and use their technological devices to order merchandise. Moreover, doing something online via the internet can help citizens to avoid unexpected accidents, such as heavy traffic. Therefore, it is undeniable that online working, shopping, and communicating are necessary for people.
On the other hand, there are also a lot of disadvantages that online can cause. Working and communicating online will limit the connection between people. It is crucial for employees in the same organization to understand and interact well with each other. One of the biggest drawbacks of connection through the Internet is a misunderstanding in conversation. It is hard for people to know truly the meaning of the message. Maybe the employers just want to express their comments regularly, but the employer may read them in a bad way. Consequently, the relationship between them is going to be broken. Hence, it is not good to work or communicate with each other fully through the Internet.
In terms of shopping, buying on the website will limit the ability for buyers to try on clothes and check out the quality of goods. While it is hard for buyers to know whether those clothes fit them or not, sellers have no way to show the buyers how good the service of the shop is. The loyalty of customers is based on several factors, in which offline service is one of the factors. So, only online shopping is difficult for both sides to express clearly and well their desire.
In conclusion, it is not a good choice for people to 100% shop, work, and communicate online. Although it seems to be convenient and save time, it includes many drawbacks that people cannot fully comprehend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | minhphambinh1234 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | cinderel | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-12 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and the plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The illustrations below show how coffee is sometimes produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 11
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...gularly, but the employer may read them in a bad way. Consequently, the relationship between...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05699481865 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93096676707 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518134715026 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.957871929 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7272727273 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04545454545 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224684515072 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648632392087 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804859056198 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138899470267 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107445700205 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.