The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The image illustrates how plastic bottles are recycled and manufactured relevant products. Overall, the process consists of nine steps, starting with collecting bottles from the rubbish bin and ending with producing end products.
Initially, when users do not use these plastic bottles anymore, those bottles are gathered in the rubbish bins and transferred to the recycling centre by a garbage truck. This plastic trash is subsequently sorted by the employees of the centre into two different types, which are reusable and non-reusable. The fourth and fifth steps of the process are to compress these reusable bottles into blocks and crush them into a liquid reservoir for cleaning purposes.
Following this, those pieces of stuff are placed into a machine to generate plastic pellets and raw materials are shaped by heating those pellets to an appropriate temperature. Raw materials are then boxed and ultimately transferred to manufacturers before transforming those into end products, such as daily-life products and accessories, and selling to markets.
- The chart below shows the numbers of three types of visitors to a museum between 1997 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 84
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 78
- An increasing number of people are choosing plastic surgery Why do people want to change the way they look Is this a positive or negative development 67
- The charts below show the protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55555555556 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88722649225 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623456790123 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1350700842 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139582486113 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723706890036 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606010732445 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951659967883 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558205307943 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.