The chart illustrates the amount of cash families used in a week at a specific country in the year 1968 and after half of a century.
In 1968, most of weekly income was spent for buying food at 35% of total figure while fuel and power just accounted for more than 5% which was in the last position. Besides that, the money for housing and clothing items was the same proportion at 10% per week. The other purposes such as household, personal goods, transport and leisure consumed about less than 10% of total cost that family paid in seven days.
After 50 years, leisure and housing became the main reason for spending which increased significantly to 22% and 19%, respectively. In contrast, the number for food was decreased sharply to almost halve. The similar trends were applied for clothes and personal goods while transport fee was nearly doubled in this year. In addition, fuel and power cost less per week at about 4% of the sum and the proportion of household goods was exact in 1968.
Overall, in the range of 50 years, there are several changes in the amount of weekly income spent by families.
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 56
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while, in addition, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66836734694 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34064706788 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586734693878 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3864911191 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167037544046 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072456606166 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668717989556 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125730241955 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542102030375 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.