The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the statistic of multiple social networking sites used by people who live in Canada in two years 2014 and 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of one site internet users was highest in both years, while the opposite was true for Five sites. In addition, there was an increase in almost all kinds of sites that the Canadian people used in 2014 and 2015, except for No sites and One site.
In 2014, people using One site comprised 36%, which was the highest number of users compare to other social networks at the same time. After one year, there was a plummet of 8% in that but continuing to be a major site, accounted for nearly a third of users. A similar trend was experienced for Canadians who did not use any social networking sites, from 22% to 21%.
By contrast, the figure for people using social from two sites to five sites all rose over the given period. Canadians who use Three sites occupied 16% in 2015, improved 4% from the previous year. Similarly, a minimal increase was witnessed in the share of users of Four sites and Five sites. The proportion of users of social networking sites was almost the same for two years, at 23% and 24% belonged to Two sites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Hanabi | view | |
| 2022-01-27 | Chloe Pham | view | |
| 2021-10-06 | Hamza khan12 | 67 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The maps show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 16
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 78
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, so, third, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52252252252 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22914270187 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.1927069482 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.4 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216810360138 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111143224364 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740600480963 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173939151798 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539868678769 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.