The chart below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008

Essay topics:

The chart below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008.

The pie chart compare household expenditures of two country UK and New Zealand, by five category in the 1980 and 2008 years.
It is noticeable that household budget spent on food and drink had fallen in both countries from 1980 to 2008, by contrast, spending on utility bills was increased.
In 1980, 23% of UK and 29% of New Zealand household budgets went on food and drink decreased to 13% and 25% respectively in both countries by 2008, whereas household spending on utility Bill in both countries rose, in the UK from 26% to 28% and in New Zealand from 27% to 31% in the 28 year period.
In 1980 and 2008, the highest proportion of UK’s household budgets spent on leisure time in each year, while in New Zealand it was third highest household spending. Also in this period UK household expenditure on leisure had increased from 27% to 34% whereas New Zealanders spending decreased from 18% to 17% . Household costs for transport saw a small decrease from 15% to 14% in UK and from 17% to 16% in New Zealand. Household spending on other things changed from 9% to 11% in both country in that shown period.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-23 ililmaidatuz 73 view
2023-09-01 minhhh123 view
2023-08-03 brew 73 view
2023-07-14 quan12341234 11 view
2023-07-14 quan12341234 11 view
Essays by user Radioactive- :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...two country UK and New Zealand, by five category in the 1980 and 2008 years. It is noti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he UK from 26% to 28% and in New Zealand from 27% to 31% in the 28 year period. ...
^^
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nders spending decreased from 18% to 17% . Household costs for transport saw a sma...
^^
Line 4, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s changed from 9% to 11% in both country in that shown period.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, third, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58793969849 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56296215345 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497487437186 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.8464276581 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25935349095 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157974383488 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833293188921 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213368525303 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586928642032 0.0819641961636 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.