The chart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.

Essay topics:

The chart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.

The given histograms highlight the information about the usage of water for different purposes by North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia. The data is calibrated in per centum.

It can be seen that Central Asia had used maximum quality of water for agriculture in contrary to other area which is 88%. In addition to this, Africa and South East Asia used nearly equal proportional of water for agriculture purpose. Moreover, water had been used by North America, South America and Europe for agriculture was 39%, 71% and 32% respectively.

Moving further, 53% of water was used by Europe for industrial use. On the other hand, Central Asia had used only 5% of the total. Both central and South East Asia used equal proportional of water for domestic use. Apart from all this, South America, Africa and Central Asia had used least proportion of water of total for industrial use. Furthermore, for domestic use water used by Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia was 9%, 7% and 7% respectively.

Overall, it is evident that maximum water was used for agriculture by all areas and least for domestic use.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-13 Fedkin 67 view
2020-01-13 Fedkin 67 view
2020-01-09 CharanpreetSingh 67 view
2020-01-09 CharanpreetSingh 73 view
2020-01-09 CharanpreetSingh 61 view
Essays by user Nikhil . Sharma :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'used the least'.
Suggestion: used the least
...th America, Africa and Central Asia had used least proportion of water of total for indust...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, apart from, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9381443299 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55358140237 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443298969072 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4748299947 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0909090909 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26238593443 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142261232101 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068531317939 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198252332499 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525376966413 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.