The maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.

Essay topics:

The maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.

The given geographical representation revels the comparison about the development of small island of 100m length to promote tourism. It is clear and coherent representation.

It is crystal clear that in past there was no reception but now reception has been constructed, following with accomodation in the east of reception. In addition to this, restaurant is opened up just above the reception. Moreover, both foot track and vehical track has been introduced to make mobility easier. Number of trees remain same before and after the upgrade of island.

Moving further, flier has been added at the south east direction from restaurant to permit axis by the boat. Apart from this, there is increment in number of water sports activities in the beach located at the far west of restaurant. Furthermore, before upgrade of island there was no accommodation but now accomodation has introduced in island.

Overall, it is evident that major developments has been taken place at the west side of island and flier is constructed at the south east to permit axis by boat.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-20 Noah1997 78 view
2019-11-27 Leeinho 78 view
2019-11-27 Saeed Najd Ataei 84 view
2019-11-13 dhnhung 56 view
2019-11-04 Nerissa 78 view
Essays by user Nikhil . Sharma :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, so, apart from, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12571428571 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95628006737 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548571428571 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5923489271 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108693494413 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456393364345 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672934625549 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638640231478 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140130449914 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.