The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The charts illustrate the grammes of three common types of fast food that were consumed in Britain in a period of 20, from 1970 to 1990 as well as the weekly expenditure spent per person for three different income groups measured in pence. Overall, it seems that despite the clear preference that the majority of people show in hamburgers, fish and chips consumption is similar to that of hamburgers and significantly higher than the one of pizza during the period.
Fish and chips, a food that costs people between 17 and 25 pence per week, started at just above 300 grammes and decreased steadily to reach a low of 200 in 1985 and finish the period at around 230. In contrast, the grammes of hamburger eaten increased rapidly during the period, especially after 1980, reaching a peak at well over 500 in 1990. More than 40 pence, which is over half the fast food expenditure of high-income rated people appears to be spent on hamburgers, opposed to slightly under 15 that is spent by the least wealthy category.
On the other hand, although pizza has also shown an upward trend, it appears to be the worst option for all the years between 1970 and the mids of 1985-2000, climbing over fish and chips approximately in 1988. This could be suspected by the small amount of money spent on it by the lower income groups, which is about 10 pence per week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | gulbakhyt_90 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Bao Linh Le | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | khaled94 | 11 | view |
| 2018-11-20 | Metallica | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-17 | Canmed | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries, and the pie chart shows the percentage of books, by type, that were borrowed over this time.Summarize the information by selecting an 84
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxi 84
- The bar chart shows the number of times per week (in 1000s), over five weeks, that three computer packages were downloaded from the internet.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'food'.
Suggestion: food
... during the period. Fish and chips, a food that costs people between 17 and 25 pen...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64315352697 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44419825895 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585062240664 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.3011695884 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.857142857 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4285714286 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186580694866 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791993021123 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510391161135 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125593045838 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389512173059 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.