Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued by many that people should not be permitted to smoke in public areas, as smoking is extremely harmful and dangerous for the health of both active and passive smokers. Personally, while I agree that smoking in these areas needs to be declined directly, I consider different methods that lie on respect to each other to be more proper than restrictions.
Smoking in public places should be eliminated for the reason that it hurts others against their will. Especially when it comes to children, it affects not only their health but also their tendency to start smoking, as they tend to mimic people in their environment. Adults who are exposed to smoking are also influenced not only by the health damage it causes, but also by the desire to smoke, that some people who have reduced or eliminated cigarettes feel. Furthermore, declining smoking in public places would prevent smokers from smoking frequently.
That reduction can be successfully achieved by means of respect and kindness, instead of violence and restriction. It is shown by history, in cases such as alcohol banning in America, that restriction might result in an unexpected outcome. However, alarming smoker's consciousness about the drawbacks of smoking in public places would improve the situation. This could be achieved by underlining the dangers that it holds for everyone's health, in addition to encouraging people not to smoke, with proper signs and advertisements.
Undoubtfully, eliminating smoking in public places would be beneficial for everyone's health. Alarming smoker's consciousness seems to be the most efficient way to prevent them from smoking in such areas while banning is a rather violent solution that may have opposite results.
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxi 84
- The bar chart shows the number of times per week (in 1000s), over five weeks, that three computer packages were downloaded from the internet.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'smokers'' or 'smoker's'?
Suggestion: smokers'; smoker's
...n unexpected outcome. However, alarming smokers consciousness about the drawbacks of sm...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'smokers'' or 'smoker's'?
Suggestion: smokers'; smoker's
...neficial for everyones health. Alarming smokers consciousness seems to be the most effi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27075812274 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83904664437 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552346570397 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4813842683 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325280496131 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126945132917 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671169897569 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203762125779 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500272263021 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.