The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004.
The figure compares the yearly salary of physicians and other workers in several countries in 2004. At first glance, it is evident that the annual salary of doctors was higher than that of other workers. Moreover, the wage of US doctors was much higher than that of in other countries.
Turning first to the doctors' earnings. Whereas in the US medical practitioners made $120.000, in Finland they earned the least, approximately $50.000 a year. Meanwhile, the doctors in France and Switzerland were paid around $70.000, followed by them in Czech Republic and Germany (just over $60.000) as well Italy with exactly $60.000.
In contrast, the other workers got much lower, at about $42.000 and $40.000 in the US and Switzerland respectively. In France, they earned approximately $30.000, while in Finland well above $20.000. The lowest wages for other workers were in Italy, Czech Republic and Germany ($20.000)
- The charts below show the proportion of British student at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 84
- Some people think secondary school students should study international nes as one of their subjects. Other peple say this is a waste of valuable school time.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004. 56
- The charts below show the proportion of British student at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 84
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, well, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06802721088 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57403675811 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557823129252 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3858845015 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7777777778 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184526975557 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937476326871 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612568488372 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135606171799 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769345555861 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.