The charts below show the proportion of British student at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso

Essay topics:

The charts below show the proportion of British student at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison.

The pie chart makes a comparison between the proportion of British pupils at one university in United Kingdom who could speak other languages in 2000 and 2010. Overall, there was an increase in the number of students who are able to speak another language other than English in 2010. Furthermore, it could be observed, with the exception of reading, the percentage of students who had knowledge of Spanish in both years were more than others.

In 2000, while 20% of students did not speak any other language except English, there was a decline in this proportion to 10% in 2010. At 30%, Spanish was a language which most students could speak in 2000, then this rose slightly by only 5% ten years later. Meanwhile, French experienced a fall by 5% compared with the last decade given.

Nothing change was seen in the remaining German spoken (10%) as well as the percentage of trilingual students (10%) in 2010. However, 2010 witnessed a 5% rise in the proportion of bilingual students, who had the ability to speak besides German, French and Spanish, representing one fifth of the total.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-30 LIMIAO 56 view
Essays by user ameeth :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...010. Furthermore, it could be observed, with the exception of reading, the percentage of students who...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, so, then, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84946236559 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59759220402 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575268817204 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3460755661 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344729555616 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153576378187 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117750468675 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230529355592 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105358131738 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.