The line graph shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012.
Overall, car theft and burglary was more than robbery.
The burglary, was more in 2003, they number was 3500 and in 2004, they began more but beginning in 2005 they number becomes decrease. In 2006 the number of burglary showed about 2700 and in 2007 they decrease more and more and number of burglary was about 1600, also in 2008 was 1100, but in 2009 it rises and showed 1500 and in 2010 they decreased slightly and it was about 1400. In 2011 the number of burglary was 1500 and 2012 it was also 1400.
Car theft beginning with 2003, before 2005 they showed nearly similar number, about 2900-3000, but in 2006 they decrease and showed 2000 and in 2007 it rises by 100 number and showed 2200. In 2008 it decreases very small and number of car theft showed 2000, then in 2009 they rise by 50-100 and showed 2300. In 2010 it also raised and was 2600, in 2011 it was 2500 and in 2012 it was 2900.
Robbery, in 2003 they start by 600 number and before 2005 they raised and showed 900. Began by 2005 to 2008 number of crime decreased by 500 and also in 2010 the number of robbery showed 700, then in 2011 and 2012 this number was 600.
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development You should use your own ideas knowledge an 56
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2013 2012 67
- It is sometimes said that people should be encouraged to get married before they are 30 as this is best both for the individual and for society Do you agree or disagree 56
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development You should use your own ideas knowledge an 56
- The chart below gives information about Southland 039 s main exports in 2000 2015 and future projections for 2005
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 6.8 338% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35021097046 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.86368017097 2.65546596893 70% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.392405063291 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.960700496 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157621109634 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103995043892 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195904020336 0.0843802449381 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174785156945 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.257804148458 0.0819641961636 315% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 90.43 61.2550243902 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.18 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.