The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities and regional centres of Australia.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of the population in cities and regional areas of Australia according to their annual income.
Overall, it can be seen that people living in cities earn a higher average income than regional centres. In both cities and regional centres, the majority of the population are lower middle or middle income earners, which means they have a yearly income of $40,000-$70,000 and $70,000-$120,000 respectively. However, in cities the largest of these two groups is the middle income earners, at 35%, while in regional centres the largest group is lower middle at around 34%.
Another similarity between cities and regional areas is that highest and lowest income earners make up the two smallest population groups. Their yearly income is under $40,000 (low), and over $120,000 (high). However, in cities the low income group makes up only about 13% of the population, which is about 10% less than regional areas. The high income group also differs between the two areas, and is 5% greater in cities.
- Many governments have laws that ban the sale and use of hard drugs such as heroin and cocaine yet they allow people to buy drugs such as tobacco and alcohol Laws that prohibit the sale and use of hard drugs should be applied to all drugs including tobacco 61
- The pie charts below show exports between the US and Vietnam Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities and regional centres of Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 67
- The map below shows the development of the town of Stromer between 1995 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 86
- The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities and regional centres of Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04142011834 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45310343575 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556213017751 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5456618986 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228855213946 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108680640775 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357938541127 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158054720942 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168694273029 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.