The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
The chart illustrates us worldwide sales of the top five handset brands between 2009 and 2013.
Overall, the highest sales of the phone by Samsung and Nokia brands. But the sales of phones by Samsung, Apple, ZTE is increased in those consecutive three years. On the other sides, The sales of Nokia and LG were decrease
First of all, in 2009, the sales by Samsung were about 225, in Apple it was near to fifty and ZTE was 50. After two years in 2011, the sales by Samsung increased by about 100, the sales of apple increased more than triple, and sales of ZTE increased in very little. In 2013, sales of Samsung, Apple, ZTE increased consecutively by 450, 150, and a little more than 50.
On other hand, the Highest sales brand Nokia was a very higher sales brand in 2009 but after that there sales decreased year by year. After 2011 they had a great fall. In case of LG, their sales also decreased year by year. But their rate of decreasing is very less compare to Nokia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | PhucHuynh | 100 | view |
| 2022-06-28 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-24 | Nguyễn Phúc Phương Trâm | view | |
| 2022-05-23 | Nguyễn Phúc Phương Trâm | view | |
| 2022-04-21 | Blueberry123 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian unive
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location 56
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ZTE was 50. After two years in 2011, the sales by Samsung increased by about 100,...
^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hat there sales decreased year by year. After 2011 they had a great fall. In case of ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46666666667 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15094007585 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9981394946 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168685692156 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835072590975 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877375920569 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146257624696 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998327092527 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.