The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people who ate at fast food restaurants in six distinct groups in the United States from 2003 and 2013.
In general, there were two types of groups which have highest percentage such as once a week and one or twice a month in 2003, 2006, and 2013 and two groups that did not welcome from people in the same period in the United States.
As can be seen, the percentage of those who ate fast food in restaurants in once a week increased about 3 percent 2006 and dropped about 6 percent in 2013. While in once or twice a month group by 2003 30 percent of people ate fast food at restaurants that decrease by 5 percent in 2006 and increase more than 35% in 2013. Those eating fast food several times a week in restaurants has a fluctuation between 16% and 20 percent during 2003 to 2013 and people use restaurants a few times a year totally has raised. Two remains groups no more significant because none of them did not more than 5 percent all these years.
As a result, people have liked to eating fast food in restaurant for once a week and once or twice a month.
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and banannas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some university students want to learn other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 50, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...l, there were two types of groups which have highest percentage such as once a week and one ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in general, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32057416268 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36839688741 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478468899522 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1086167044 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202196071847 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116187496971 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669673250958 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1377265714 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054585803628 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.37 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.