the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2002 and 2013.
summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart below illustrates the number of time the American went to restaurants to consume processed food in a decade.
Overall, as can be seen, most of the people spent on eating fast food once time a week or several times a month, by contrast, the proportion of residents never or regularly go to the restaurant was the lowest over the period shown.
The most striking feature is the number of people consume junk food in restaurants once time a week in 2006 (around 33%) which was followed by a moderate decrease in the next 6 years. The figure for the consumer just once or twice a month significantly rose to approximately 33%.
There was a dramatic increase in consumer numbers several times a week peaking at about 20% in 2006, while 2013 observed an upward pattern in consumer numbers a few times a year. The number of people never went to restaurants to eat fast food or those did as a daily basis slightly dropped to the lowest point, mere hovering from 3 to 4 %.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-13 | Minhthuminhthumingthu | 78 | view |
- units of electricity by fuel source in Australia and France 78
- the following two pie charts show the results of survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1995 and 1985 61
- the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2002 and 2013.summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- should education and healthcare be free of charge and funded by the government or should be the responsibility of the individuals to pay for the services. discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- in a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.discuss both vi 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56818181818 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59523203977 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3348997217 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117758898679 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068705210041 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468845007563 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866927743866 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307035298766 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.