The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007,2011 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the number of households by the annual income in America between2007 and 2015.
Overall, it is dear that the number of household which annual income less than 49.999 dollar experienced trend of first rising and then failing, while the number of family that the annual income Over 15.000dolar in the opposite direction which witnessed a tendency to decline and then increase. In addition, the number of middle income families was the major group in the USA.
The number of households which anal income less than 25,000 dollar grew sharply from 25 million to 28 million between 2007 and 2011, then dropping to 27 million in 2015. The figure for household which annual income be in 25,000 dollar to 49000 dollar with the same tend that increased remarkably in to 29 million in 2011, then declining to 28 million in 2015. However, the annual earning between 50,000 dollar to 74,999 dollar kept stable to 21 million from 2007 to 2015.
There was an opposite trend in the annual income over 75,000 dollar. The number of families with the annual income aver100,000 was the highest in 2007 and 2005, respectively are 29 million and 33 million which shaved an increase trend, while showed a slightly decrease to 27 million in 2011. The annual income between 76,000 dollar to 99.000 dollar was at the same trend which the number of household was the lowest declined from 14 million to 13 million betueen2007 and 2011, then increasing to 15 million in 2015.
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 61
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your ans 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...ual income be in 25,000 dollar to 49000 dollar with the same tend that increased remar...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
... shaved an increase trend, while showed a slightly decrease to 27 million in 2011. The annual incom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88095238095 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38962705465 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43253968254 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1757115194 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200236664064 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121833628301 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538486136748 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170751970312 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529338493842 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...ual income be in 25,000 dollar to 49000 dollar with the same tend that increased remar...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
... shaved an increase trend, while showed a slightly decrease to 27 million in 2011. The annual incom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88095238095 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38962705465 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43253968254 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1757115194 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200236664064 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121833628301 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538486136748 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170751970312 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529338493842 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.