The chart below shows the number of Internet users in three different countries and the world average between 1998 and 2013. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart indicates the amount of people who had access to the Internet in Greece, Denmark, Canada and the global average between 1998 and 2013.
Overall, we can see that the number of Internet users in Denmark and Canada always dominated in the 15-year period. In contrast, Greece had fewer users, which was close to the world average, but both gradually increased just as the other countries did.
To be more specific, the figure for Danish using the Internet rose by 4 times during 15 years, which was 23000 people at the beginning to 95000 people. In 1998, it had the second highest number of Internet users, but it had surpassed Canada by 1003. While growth after 2003 for Canada was slow. The nation’s overall number of users ultimately expanded by more than threefold from 1998 to 2013. Besides, the number of Greek, who used the Internet went up by 20000 users every 5 years. Although the world average climbed as well, moving from about 3000 users to 35000 users, the gap between it and the three countries included in the chart had widened at the end of the period in question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | Nguyên-MTTN | 78 | view |
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional live and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 67
- Many women are in workforce today but only few are in senior positions What causes this phenomenon Suggest possible solutions that would resolve this issue 73
- Some people say that money should be the main measure of success and personal status and wealthy people should be in high demand To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Overall, we can see that the number of Internet users in Denmark and Canada alw...
^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the beginning to 95000 people. In 1998, it had the second highest number of Inte...
^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sides, the number of Greek, who used the Internet went up by 20000 users every 5 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, second, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69948186528 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20389440027 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580310880829 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7681085753 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.777777778 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22914171726 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938624870654 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581208777118 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159200885112 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413426831084 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.