The chart below shows the number of the Internet users in three different countries and the world average between 1998 and 2013

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of the Internet users in three different countries and the world average between 1998 and 2013

The bar chart illustrates how many people using the Internet in three countries namely Greece, Denmark, Canada and the world average over the course of 15 years starting in 1998.
Overall, looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that an upward trend was witnessed in the number of Internet users of all countries and the world average. It is also notable that during the period shown with the exception of 1998, Denmark registered the highest figure.
In 1998, the number of people using Internet in Denmark was the second highest, at roughly 25 thousand. However, this figure significantly quadrupled to 80 thousand and surpassed Canada in 2003. In the term of Canada, after having experienced a dramatic increase in the quantity of users to 70 thousand, it grew steadily by 18 thousand till the end of the time frame.
Greece had the lowest number of Internet users, at only 3 thousand in 1988 but there was a gradual growth in the figure by 20 thousand people each 5-year period. Likewise the world average climbed as well, moving from 4 thousand to 35 thousand users at the of the end period in question.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (5 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...so notable that during the period shown with the exception of 1998, Denmark registered the highest fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
... 20 thousand people each 5-year period. Likewise the world average climbed as well, movi...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, look, second, so, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81347150259 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52035127077 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59067357513 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9833941288 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229525541125 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101283721411 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080721569518 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153927522003 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067324866592 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.