The graph below shows the employment rate of each gender in four different countries in 2002.
The graph below shows the employment rate of each gender in four different countries in 2002.
The bar chart illustrates the levels of employments of two sexes in four countries namely South Africa, Chile, Finland, Norway in the year 2022.
Overall, it can be seen that the proportion of male employees was higher than that of female in all four countries. It is also notable that the proportion of employees in the two genders in Norway was both higher than that in the others.
Looking at the graph more closely, one can see that the quantity of Norwegian men in work was the dominant, accounting for almost 80%, whereas that of male employees in South Africa was the lowest, at 50% over the period shown. Meanwhile, the figures for Chilean and Finnish men staffs were close behind, at roughly 70%.
As was the case with men, the proportions of women employees in Norway and Finland were relatively evenly distributed, at around 70%. Likely, the amount of women in workforce in South Africa registered about 38%, which was equal to that in Chile.
18/06/2021
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-23 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Jaden_ | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the employment rate of each gender in four different countries in 2002 78
- The chart below shows the number of the Internet users in three different countries and the world average between 1998 and 2013 82
- The first chart below shows the number of British visitors to the US and American visitors to the UK from 2011 to 2015 The second chart shows the amount spent by those visitors in that period 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r in four different countries in 2002. The bar chart illustrates the levels of ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...38%, which was equal to that in Chile. 18/06/2021
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85792349727 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49410305147 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3978263648 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238566322165 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155060176052 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.321698483467 0.0843802449381 381% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200031528765 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.360303244606 0.0819641961636 440% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.