Should we allow GM Food? Give reasons to support your opinion.
In the information age, some opinions argued that GM food is good because it brings farmers more extra income and reduces the risk of natural disasters. Meanwhile, others think that there are numerous adverse consequences which customers can receive in the future. In my opinion, I consider that farmers should balance between two sides: their benefits and customers' benefit, they should lean into any sides.
On the one hand, a growing body of research suggests that one of five jobs which earn the least salary is farmers. Therefore, researchers have a tendency to create inventions so that farmers could utilize these and boost their life quality, and GM food is born. Besides that, it will be more straightforward for any farmers about their crops which must face natural disasters. Only these two strengths can enhance farmers' life quality and make them more salary on their budget. This means that they can have a better life and pay more daily expenses for themselves. Taking Vietnam as an example, more than 63% of farmers there have a better life because of profound inventions, especially science inventions.
On the other hand, there are a plethora of weaknesses in GM food. Although it can boost their farmers' lives, the bad effects of GM food in the future to the customers are controversial. Looking back about the pretty same inventions which improved farmers' lives in the past, there are a lot of cases which kill the lives of very many people. To be more clear, if customers use a lot of GM food products, they can not only not prolong their life expectancy but also deteriorate their health much at a young age. Therefore, individuals do not completely have any beneficial reasons to use products which contain GM food even though until now, there is no proof about the bad impacts of GM food on people. Taking any underdeveloped countries around the world as an example, they truly use a lot of such products from the past until now. They become people who lack awareness, knowledge and their life is too short to live and dedicate. Nonetheless, they are poor so they must accept this situation as a destiny, and they suffer from that on a daily basis. It is easy to understand that everyone does not want to try these products which contain genetic modification because of those.
In conclusion, every invention has both pros and cons so sellers (farmers) can balance between customers' benefits and their benefits to apply enough GM food products into the market. In my opinion, I suppose that everyone has a different choice, they can decide to buy any food based on their interests and demands. Obviously, there are a lot of the poor. , so they have to save money to save their life in lieu of splurging money on unnecessary pieces of stuff like original products. I think that we can enable GM food to be sold in the markets because there are numerous individuals who need to use those products for living their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun GM seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of (GM)'.
Suggestion: a lot of (GM)
...ple. To be more clear, if customers use a lot of GM food products, they can not only not pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...Obviously, there are a lot of the poor. , so they have to save money to save thei...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, i suppose, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 52.0 24.0651302605 216% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2442.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 507.0 315.596192385 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81656804734 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56079892131 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.9 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2454169522 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.173913043 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0434782609 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73913043478 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143877646216 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468242814636 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576091189038 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101226146672 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444600860788 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.