The chart below shows the numbers of three types of visitors to a museum between 1997 and 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart demonstrates the changes that have taken place in the total numbers of three categories of visitors to a museum from 1997 to 2012. Overall, the visitors who were adults accounted for the highest numbers, while the data for the special exhibition guests were lowest over the period. Additionally, in 2007, there were more than 520 thousand tourists came to the museum.
Regarding the total number of tourists in each year, ranking after 2007, there were 504300 visitors in 2012, followed by 441200 and 448100 people in 2002 and 1997 respectively. Looking at the figure for those were under 15, there was a downward trend happened during the peiod, which began at 120000 tourists in 1997 and decreased steadily to 82300 tourists in 2012.
Turning to the figure for adult visitors, over 300 thousand people was observed to visit the museum in 1997 and 2002. The number then rose to about 400 thousand people in 2007, before declining to 380 thousand people in 2012. The reported data turned adult visitors to the group that visisted the museum the most. In terms of those who were the special exhition guests, the figure was less than 50 thousand over the 15 years, starting with 28 thousand people in 1997 and ending with 42 thousand peole in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the lowest'.
Suggestion: were the lowest
... data for the special exhibition guests were lowest over the period. Additionally, in 2007,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83027522936 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27724921441 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52752293578 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9614011297 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157599188163 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800868948803 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620295089626 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114893778866 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259022504223 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the lowest'.
Suggestion: were the lowest
... data for the special exhibition guests were lowest over the period. Additionally, in 2007,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83027522936 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27724921441 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52752293578 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9614011297 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157599188163 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800868948803 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620295089626 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114893778866 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259022504223 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.