The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950-2002, with projections to 2050.
The graph illustrates that what the proportions of population in four countries (India, China, USA and Japan) account for the gross world population at 1950, 2002, 2050, respectively.
The ratio of population in India shows an upward trend from 1950 to 2050. It started with 15% of the whole population at 1950, and jumped to just below 20% of the total number in 2002. Then, it is expected to climb to more than 20% slightly at 2050.
The other three countries all have a continuous decline at this period but with different speed. In China, there is the most dramatic decrease between 1950 and 2050. After becoming the most crowded countries at 1950 (just over 25%), the percentage of population drops to around 18% at 2050.
There is a different falling trend in USA which fell mildly from 10% to 8% between 1950 and 2002, more importantly, the projections predict the proportion of it will stay at 8% at 2050. Also, Japan share a similar with USA, the ratio of population always the smallest percentage of the whole population at the whole period.
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems. Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both views and 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950-2002, with projections to 2050. 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 84
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor-bike. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Japan) must be used with a third-person verb: 'shares'.
Suggestion: shares
...it will stay at 8% at 2050. Also, Japan share a similar with USA, the ratio of popula...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7868852459 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55395361913 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1391661292 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42625062797 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176143040636 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808255105971 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265529780841 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437422755907 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.