The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart gives us information about the proportion of coffee and tea purchasing and residents’ drinking habits in five different cities in Australia
As is observed, the figure for people going to a cafe for tea or coffee in the last 4 weeks accounted for the highest percentage among 4 municipalities, except Adelaide, while the percentage of people buying fresh coffee made up the lowest proportion of the chart.
Regarding the first three cities, the proportion of people who went to a cafe remained the highest, at about 63% in Melbourne, followed by 62% and around 55% in Sydney and Brisbane, respectively. While the figure for residents buying instant coffee witnessed a slight increase, from about 45% in Sydney to 53% in Brisbane, the percentage of people drinking fresh coffee was relatively low, which was at about 43% in Sydney and decreased to approximately 35% in Brisbane.
According to Hobart and Adelaide, the ratio of citizens who bought fresh coffee continued to be the lowest figure, at about 35% in both cities. In Hobart, the percentage of residents buying instant coffee was at 55%, which was higher than that of Adelaide. Furthermore, the figure for citizens who went to a café in the last 4 weeks was relatively high, stood at 63% in Hobart and around 50% in Adelaide
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart gives us information about the proportion of coffee and tea purchasing and residents drinking habits in five different cities in Australia 67
- People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- For many employers formal academic qualifications are becoming more important than experience Why is this a negative trend 100
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94063926941 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8276087493 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48401826484 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.164399975 43.030603864 242% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 180.333333333 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.5 22.9334400587 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179927843606 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086246494188 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807178702843 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145058582311 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915186719017 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.2329268293 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.4329268293 236% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.