The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.
The given charts give information about six different married age ranges in one particular country, in 1996 and 2008
Overall, it is apparent that the percentage of both men and women getting married under 30 decreased slightly, while the opposite is true for those older than 30. Moreover, 25-29 was the most popular age range for women to get married, while it was 30-34 for men.
Regarding the first three age groups, the figures for people getting married at age of 16-19 registered the lowest percentage, with women at less than 2% in 1996 and 0.5% in 2008. It was clear that men showed no tendency to marry during this age. The percentage of women aged 20-24 decreased dramatically, from 6% in 1996 to approximately 3% in 2008. A similar pattern was true for men, with the rate raging from less than 2% to 2.5%. Noticeably, the proportion of women belonging to the 25-29 remained the same in both years, standing at about 12%, while that of men declined slightly to less than 10% in 2008.
Regarding older age groups, a considerable rise to 8% for females and 11% for males could be seen in the 30-34 age group. Additionally, the percentage increase for men aged 35-39 was four times higher than that for women in the same year, with 4% and 1% respectively. Finally, the age group of 40-44 reached its peak at 7% for men and over 2% for women.
- People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 77
- People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008 78
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 32.9175257732 30% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 937.175257732 119% => OK
No of words: 242.0 206.0 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59917355372 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50243034658 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 127.690721649 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537190082645 0.622605031667 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 290.88556701 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.9406268429 44.8134815571 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3 76.5299724578 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 16.8248392259 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 4.34317383033 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184335736117 0.216113520407 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849711589806 0.0766984524023 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806414329676 0.0603063233224 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169440154925 0.12726935374 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158027286642 0.0580467560999 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 8.37731958763 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 70.7449484536 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 8.71597938144 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 41.2886597938 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 8.62886597938 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.