The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The chart provides information about the total number of minutes of telephone calls in the United Kingdom split in three groups in the period of seven years.
We can see from the data that the local calls numbers fluctuated slightly, the minutes being fewer at the end, but they still remained the highest throughout 1995 to 2002 compared to the other two call types. While the mobile calls numbers rocketed, starting at around 3 billion in 1995 and reaching 45 billion in 2002. The mobile calls popularity increased by around 10 times during the period of time presented in the chart.
However the minutes of national and international calls started from a little below 40 billion to 60 billion. The numbers had a gradual rise.
In the beginning, there was significant discrepancy between the numbers of local calls and mobile calls, the first reaching around 70 billion minutes meanwhile the other only having 3 billion but in the end the difference diminished to 70 billion, respectively 45 billion.
- Some people believe hat unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reason 61
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 85
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at lea 84
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'calls'' or 'call's'?
Suggestion: calls'; call's
...We can see from the data that the local calls numbers fluctuated slightly, the minute...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'calls'' or 'call's'?
Suggestion: calls'; call's
... other two call types. While the mobile calls numbers rocketed, starting at around 3 ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...increased by around 10 times during the period of time presented in the chart. However the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...riod of time presented in the chart. However the minutes of national and internation...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02380952381 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58154974637 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9097849036 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.571428571 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292296706688 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138837657966 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632883394156 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182596879381 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420046713024 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.