The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph depicts information about the time spent by the people of UK in various types of telephone calls between 1995 and 2002.

In an overview, it can be noticed that, the local fixed line calls was very popular in Britain in all years as opposed to other types of calls .

As it is apparently from the figure that, local calls which was the highest prefered phone calls in the year 1995, at about 72 billions stabilized at the same level in 2002 which although reached at its peak level of 90 billions in the year 1999. Similar trend of increment can be seen for national and international fixed calls, which was around 36 billions in the year 1995 increased gradually and almost doubled to about 60 billuons in 2002.

Likewise, as for mobile calls, it was the least used method in the initial year at just 2 billions climbed slowly and reached to 12 billions in 1999 then the trend soared to 44 billions in 2002, a rise of around 11 folds in 7 years.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...years as opposed to other types of calls . As it is apparently from the figure...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, likewise, so, then, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46892655367 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30263759227 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.4162966346 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.2 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.4 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152445260868 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909309604116 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045335496032 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993852412865 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479783013842 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.24 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.