The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram depicts information about energy consumption by fuel in U.S from 1980 to 2030 in quadrillion units.
In an overview, it can be noticed that U.S relied more on nonrenewable sources and is predicted to remain in same trend as oppose to renewable sources in later years.
As can be depicted from the figure that, petrol and oil which was the most used source of energy in the initial year is predicted to rise for about 50 quadrillion units in 2030. Similar trend of increment can be seen for coal however, in lesser quantities.
As for natural gas, although the use fluctuated between 25 to 17 quadrillion units from 1993 to 2015, it is expected to remain constant at 25 quadrillion units until the projected years. nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower which was the least used source of energy in the initial years is estimated to increase by 2 and 1 for nuclear and solar/wind respectively. Incase of hydropower, although erratic trend for first 3 decades it will level off at its initial level in 2030.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...n about energy consumption by fuel in U.S from 1980 to 2030 in quadrillion units....
^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...n an overview, it can be noticed that U.S relied more on nonrenewable sources and...
^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: AS_OPPOSE_TO_AS_OPPOSED_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as opposed to'?
Suggestion: as opposed to
...nd is predicted to remain in same trend as oppose to renewable sources in later years. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nuclear
...illion units until the projected years. nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower which was th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: INCASE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in case of'?
Suggestion: In case of
...or nuclear and solar/wind respectively. Incase of hydropower, although erratic trend for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82386363636 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75257556888 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573863636364 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.103734359 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112298128322 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634658411423 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889965146584 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957788426842 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103975328565 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.