The chart shows the global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.

Essay topics:

The chart shows the global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.

The bar chart depicts information about the worldwide sales for the top five best selling handphone brands in million units from 2009 to 2013.

In an overview, it can be noticed that, the global leaders documented were samsung and nokia as compared to other brands throughout the given period of time.

As can be depicted from the figure that, samsung sold around 250 million phones in 2009 rose significantly to about 450 millions in 2013, a rise of about 200 millions in 4 years. Similar trend of increment can be seen in case of apple however, in lesser quantities.

On the other hand, nokia which was the largest selling brand at 2009 slumped to 250 million in the final year.Similarly, for LG, the sales almost halved from about 130 million to 70 milliin in the later year. As for ZTE the sales remained almost constant at 55 million units throughout the given period of time.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...p five best selling handphone brands in million unit from 2009 to 2013. In an overv...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similarly
...lumped to 250 million in the final year.Similarly, for LG, the sales almost halved from a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...illion to 70 milliin in the later year. As for ZTE the sales remained almost const...
^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t 55 million units throughout the given period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, so, as for, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 706.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77027027027 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4955402149 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 198.0 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4015198889 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187662076484 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925794952115 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100384753999 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124876698512 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10664689412 0.0819641961636 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.