The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 the table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compare with 2015 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main f

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. the table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compare with 2015.

Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart compares the value of the export earning in different kinds of things between 2015 and 2016 of the country, and the table shows the percentage changes in this goods values.

It is noticeable that all the export earnings increase from 2015 to 2016 except for the gems and jewellery. We can also see that the percentage of the gems and jewellery decrease.

According to the bar chart, textiles increases the most from 2015 to 2016 which export earnings increase 6 billions. The second categories is the engineered goods that increase nearly 3 millions. However, the germs and jewellery decrease in this period that decline about 2 billions which the other kinds of goods is in rising trend.

Looking at the table that illustrates the percentage change in various categories that the textiles changes the most among the five categories that increase 15.24%. Also, the agricultural products go up the least which the percentage just 0.81. While the germs and jewellery decrease 5.18%, the proportion of petroleum products and engineered goods are increased which occupy in 3% and 8.5%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 84 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 80 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 73 view
2023-12-09 Tosyne 78 view
Essays by user MinyiChu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e table shows the percentage changes in this goods values. It is noticeable that ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, second, so, well, while, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10497237569 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58205588755 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4219587421 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277437568609 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111700577163 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111283444565 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186897046411 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946371831944 0.0819641961636 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.