The chart below shows the waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015.
The bar chart depicts the garbage amount gathered by a recycling centre between 2011 and 2015.
In general, there were four rubbish types collected through the entire period. The highest portion was almost taken by paper waste, except the year 2013. Meanwhile, garden trash occupied the lowest figure from 2011 to 2015.
To begin with, paper waste was the most popular waste in this recycling centre, which always overwhelmed others’ figures. Particularly, paper trash dominated in the whole graph and reached a peak in 2015 with 70 tons of garbage. The second highest rubbish kind was glass, which once took the largest portion of the chart in the year 2013 with 48 tons.
To contrast, garbage from garden occupied the lowest position in the graph. Moreover, its figure fluctuated constantly in the period 2011-2015, and the highest situation that it could reach was 35 garbage tons in the last year. Similarly, the tins trash’s waste was also unstable, with the least number of 27 tons in 2012 and the highest figure of 39 tons in 2015.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, second, similarly, so, while, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95454545455 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32396782385 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9034048102 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249909183857 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099610635792 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872960375862 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173390091854 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826701260908 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.