Some people say that drug companies have a responsibility to spend money on researching medicines that will help people in poorer countries. Others say the main responsibility of drug companies is to make money. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The trend of materialistic lifestyle nowaday has become ubiquitous in various career fields, particularly in the moral realm of medication in which medical practitioners prior monetary accumulation. In my opinion, while it is irrefutable in certain cases, the majority of medical human resources actively partake in investing in new treatment and rescuing patients from all over the world. In this essay, I will delve into the reasons behind both arguments and shed more positive light on them.
First and foremost, we could not deny the pivotal role of money in our daily life, specifically in terms of the investigating process which necessitates both human workforce and machinery. To achieve a groundbreaking medical treatment aligns with the great effort of doctors and medical workers who are also existing in our lives as a human being with their personal and substantial human needs nurtured by money. Furthermore, medical research appears to be a specific job related heavily to human existence which can not be experimented clumsily, necessitating a huge monetary investment in specialized machinery.
Set aside the fact of moral degradation in some medical practitioners by their practice of material accumulation, there are a vast number of doctors and medicators serving discreetly in remote areas and secret laboratories without the desire to achieve public recognition or self-reputation. Dr Phan, for a profound example, working in his personal clinic is serving his society as a hero without the heroic cloak. He has secretly rescued an uncountable number of HIV/AIDS patients without monetary support and appreciation from his relatives and patients.
In conclusion, it is an undeniable fact of priority of money in certain doctors and drug companies due to the crucial role of materials in the research process, including human labor and facilities. However, the majority of medical practitioners are actively striving to bring their abilities closer to poor and remote circumstances discreetly.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 73
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting t 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 395, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs nurtured" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'nurturing' or 'to be nurtured'.
Suggestion: nurturing; to be nurtured
...ir personal and substantial human needs nurtured by money. Furthermore, medical research...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and patients. In conclusion, it is an undeniable fact of priority of money in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51612903226 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16710459392 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603225806452 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8616267101 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.454545455 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0654215627449 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0262894321509 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390343996001 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0441978593839 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361133886474 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.