The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the Anthropologists in work after five years.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of destinations that Anthropology graduate students from one university choose to work when their undergraduate degree course finished. The table chart depicted the incomes of Anthropology graduates after 5 years throughout the period of working time in 3 types of employment.
Overall, the bar chart indicates that full-time work is predominant compared to other destinations. The bar chart shows that the majority of graduates earning more than $100.000 after 5 years of working are registered the highest rates among other categories.
It is immediately apparent that graduate students in primary take full-time jobs, with 52% accounted for. However, part-time work and postgrad study are least appealed to graduates with just about 5%. The full-time postgraduate study is responsible for 8%, hitting the same figure of students who have unverified destinations. It is estimated that graduates and unemployed graduate students accounted for 15% and 8%, respectively.
On the other hand, the salaries of Anthropology graduates is a constant concern. With the income of $25.000 -$49.999 for all 3 types of employment are responsible for 5%, 5% and 10%, respectively. $50.000 - $74.999 earned by graduates after 5 years of working period account for 15%, 15% and 35%, respectively. There is a remarkable upturn in the salary, with $75.000 - $99.999 recorded. Coincidentally, the data of graduates in this salary category witnessed a significant increase, compared to two previous types of incomes, at 40%, 30% and 25%, respectively. Graduate students with $100.000 income are seen to be the highest rate of the table, at 40%, 50% and 30%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are spending more and more of their time indoors What do you think are the causes of this problem What measures could best be taken to solve it 61
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are spending more and more of their time indoors What do you think are the causes of this problem hat measures could best be taken to solve it 61
- Even though Globalization affects the world s economics in a very positive way its negative sides should not be forgotten Discuss 61
- Some people think that hosting international sports events is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, incidentally, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46360153257 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15338211493 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0060066597 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.857142857 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258033319399 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955281034473 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987356734769 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188765525284 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136306700768 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.