The maps show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
The maps depict several considerable changes in Islip town center in the period from present to the future planned development.
Overall, according to the town’s description at the present time, the facilities are simplification, while the blueprint of the future planned town is seen to be more complex than the prelude idea in the present.
It is immediately apparent that the number of the center’s service in the future is anticipated to increase dramatically, with the emergence of shopping center, car park, walking street and bus station. By the time in the present, Islip town utilize the road as the primary for all vehicles. However, the road in the future’s plan will only embrace pedestrians. With the spread of globalization, New housing section for Islip’s residents in the future will be substantially set up by the town’s authority. In addition, people in the Islip still can live in old housing. Currently, the town’s citizens normally reside in two housing sections. The location for juveniles in Islip town throughout the period applying the curriculum with an aim for their education remains unchanged, and same with the park of the town. The distinction proceeds with the dual carriageway which is another construction project in the future. Compared to the town’s infrastructure nowadays, this idea is considered as a radical change of the town
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- Some people think that hosting international sports events is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The diagrams below show two methods of using water to produce electricity 82
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 84
- The diagrams below show two methods of using water to produce electricity Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27601809955 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02948526366 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592760180995 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0494817484 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226019249628 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891005525121 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604920564705 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157476634603 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447996879488 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.