The bar chart shows the highest qualification attained by sex for the working age population in Wales in 2001 2002.
The bar chart gives information about the highest qualification gained by males and females for the working-age population in Wales in 2001/2002.
Looking from an overall perspective, the figure for males was higher than its female counterpart in A, C, and E, while the reverse pattern was witnessed in the other segments.
As the chart portrays, nearly 29% of C possessed by males, which was the highest proportion of men in the research, doubled to the figure of females. On the other hand, females were predominating in percentage when it comes to D at 28%, while there were 18% males. It is noticing that there was an equivalence between the statistics of F and B. To be precise, the ratio of F and B gained by women was 23% and 8% respectively, however, in F, the distance was somewhat more than in B at 3%.
It is also clear that for other qualifications, 13% man kept this object compared to 11% of women. Meanwhile, the distinction in A was 5% owing to 18% males and 11% females.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-13 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | lili__nhnh | 59 | view |
| 2020-10-22 | 81206Ecema | 54 | view |
| 2020-08-03 | stsoutsold | 86 | view |
| 2018-07-12 | catmandu | 42 | view |
- the graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group 1998 2000 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 84
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 50
- The charts below show population statistics in two countries of the UK from 1700 to 2000 78
- The graph provides information about the amount of oil discovered worldwide from 1950 to 2020 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5988700565 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92611736817 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0970581576 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187874879729 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877850721924 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179986737388 0.0843802449381 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162917740093 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.228867913433 0.0819641961636 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.