The chart shows that distribution of employed and unemployed people in Philippines in 1932 and in 1992.
The Pie chart illustrates as how people's employed and unemployed in the country of Philippines in the years 1932 and 1992.
Overall, at the beginning of the most of the people's employed in industries where as government sectors defects the least employment in that. Besides, at the end of the era services were the most significant segment, but although few of the people left unemployed.
In the beginning of the era the employment rates in the government sector was barely 3% which rose much to 15% in the year 1992. On the other hand services experience more than three-fold growth and captured two quarters of the employment in the country of Philippines in the year 1992.
Industries experienced almost three times of downfall from 42 % to 15%. However agriculture and fishing also went down ranging from 15 % to 8%. Whatsoever would be the scenario the most important changes seen with the downfall of unemployment which fell down from 25% to 10% at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-06 | navjot jammu | 78 | view |
- Some people argue that public transportation should be made completely free of charge. Are there more advantages over disadvantages of this decision? 84
- Parents and teachers make many rules for children to encourage good behaviour and protect them from danger. However, children would benefit from few rules and greater freedom. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 56
- The diagram below shows how geothermal Energy is used to produce electricity. 56
- The bar chart shows the divorce rate into European countries from 2011 to 2015 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The Pie chart illustrates as how peoples employed and unemployed in the country o...
^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...t of the peoples employed in industries where as government sectors defects the least em...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ree times of downfall from 42 % to 15%. However agriculture and fishing also went down ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90419161677 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7899392597 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568862275449 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5730799099 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278033985704 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123382393406 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157321493581 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206933254417 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184798415706 0.0819641961636 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.