The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.
The comparison in mobile cells and landlines per a hundred people in seven different western nations is displayed in the bar chart, shown in number.
Overall, smartphones are the most popular in European countries, except in Denmark. However, the counterpart model is the most well-known in American ones.
As per data, mobile phone users in Italy are the largest at 90, followed by them in Sweden and the UK at more than 80, respectively. Meanwhile, those in Denmark are slightly as same as the latter, being higher than the number of Germany, with a gap of ten persons. Nevertheless, that of Canada and the US account for below a half of the maximum data recorded.
Turning to the landlines, ownership of Danish stands as the biggest, with the number as equal as that of Sweden owning smartphones. Then, Italian using this model undergoes to below 50 people, being the lowest number. Furthermore, Swedish utilizing it make up almost 70 users, being bigger than British and German by only ten people, running. When it comes to the American continent, the figure for land liners in the US shares a similar number with them in Sweden, and Canadian make up more than 60.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-known in American ones. As per data, mobile phone users in Italy are the larg...
^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...mber. Furthermore, Swedish utilizing it make up almost 70 users, being bigger than B...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86069651741 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6221784656 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606965174129 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.400880268 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168287041983 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578699322219 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864597659064 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112056365253 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112151973298 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.