The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK 2010.
The bar chart gives information about men and female teachers in six types of educational institutions in the UK in 2010. It shows what percentage of teachers were male and what percentage were female.
Women predominated in schools for children. This was particularly true of schools for very young children. Over 95 per cent of nursery school teachers, for example, were female. The situation was similarly one-sided in primary schools, where over 90 per cent of teachers were women.
Men and women were more equally represented in teaching institutions catering for older children and young adults: secondary schools and colleges. College lectures, for example, were 50 per cent female and 50 per cent male.
Males held a larger share of teaching posts n higher-level institutions. This was particularly true for universities, where twice as many males were teaching staff than females
Overall, women were more likely to hold the more typically maternal role of teaching young children. Males, on the other hand, predominated in the higher status teaching role of university lecturer.
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses It is right to exclude males and females from certain professions because of their gender 56
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses It is right to exclude males or females from certain profession because of their gender 61
- bar chart 51
- Topic the bar chart 11
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2010 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e male and what percentage were female. Women predominated in schools for childr...
^^^
Line 4, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y males were teaching staff than females Overall, women were more likely to hold ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, similarly, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35465116279 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86586628473 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563953488372 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.858902241 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7272727273 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185098304573 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769316858735 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125303088659 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128707362496 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184178658907 0.0819641961636 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.