Topic: the bar chart
The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of women and men teachers in six distinguished fields of educational setting in the British in 2010.
It is evident that the female gender has a dramatic presence in fields related to kindergarten and primary school, while the male teachers account for major of the rest of the types of educational setting.
Regarding pre-school, the number of female teachers made up 98%, which was significantly higher than that of the male teachers, at nearly 2%. Similarly, the female teachers also comprised commonly in primary school, approximately nine times more than male teachers.
Men and women were more equally represented in educational setting related to secondary school, college, and private training institutes. In secondary school, there was closely as many men ( approximately 45%) as women (at 50%), this was also true of private training institute. The percentage of male and female teachers in college saw the same at 50%. In university, the men teachers outnumbered sharply women ( roughly 70% vs 30% respectively).
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses It is right to exclude males and females from certain professions because of their gender 56
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK 2010 84
- bar chart 51
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses It is right to exclude males or females from certain profession because of their gender 61
- Topic the bar chart 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry school, there was closely as many men approximately 45% as women at 50%, this ...
^^
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e men teachers outnumbered sharply women roughly 70% vs 30% respectively.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38922155689 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02502500679 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568862275449 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5220395789 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.04417662896 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0247316481175 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654337904316 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.049463296235 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856729421888 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.