The charts below give information about the percentage of the world forest and also the percentage of the timber in five different regions.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the distribution proportion of global forest and also the percentage of timber in five different continents, namely South America, Africa, Asia, Europe and North America.
Overall, North America accounted for the highest proportions of both forest and timber production. It is also clear that Africa, despite having the largest forest cover among the five given continents, produced the smallest amount of timber.
In terms of the first pie chart, Africa constituted 27% of the total global forest, making itself the most thickly forested region. North America occupies around 25%, and the forest cover rates of Europe, South America and Asia were somewhat less, with the figures amounting to 18%, 16% and 14% respectively.
As regards the second pie chart, North America produced the most timber at around 30%, which was followed by South America (23%), Europe (20%) and Asia (18%). Meanwhile, Africa’s timber production occupied a negligible 9%, ranking last among the given regions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-25 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty in three states in USA Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- The diagram below gives information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the development of the cutting tool in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the UK the rest of Europe and Japan from 1993 to 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41139240506 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51128681128 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632911392405 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2688491916 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157204280739 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826749227285 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057853215802 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112793473195 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510452138714 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.