Most urgent issues can only be solved by international corporations.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that many of the alarming matters can be exclusively solved by collaborative effort of organizations on the globe. I totally agree with this point of view.
Some people express disagreement on the effectiveness of co-operation, saying that small-scale issues cannot be solved completely. This might be reasonable. For instance, reducing crime rates within a region does not need the participation of international governments but solely local authority. Indigenous policemen specifically know the area as well as related illegal activities, so they would excel in arresting dangerous criminals. Another example is a collision of multiple vehicles on a road, which can only be instantly solved by the government of a place. Injured victims can be transported to the hospital and damaged cars pulled away very quickly by road workers.
Having said that, the joint action has proved to be effective in tackling alarming threats. One reason is that a burden could be shared among members. One classic example is the battle against food crisis in Africa. The developed countries on this continent tried their best to support the underdeveloped ones in vain as the matter was significant. It was not until there were collaborative hands of nations from other lands that the food shortages were dramatically alleviated, bringing happiness and promising prospect to the disadvantaged people. Another reason is that technological assistance can be seen in the participation of international groups. When several Latin-American countries jointly protected endangered animal species, the nations with more superior technology would help the others, making the protective activity efficient and strict. Security cameras were installed in almost every national park; positioning equipment was attached to crucial animal individuals in certain populations. Thanks to the coaction, poaching has been sharply decreased and most species in danger have been living in shelters now.
In conclusion, urgent concerns can be effectively dealt with by the co-operative activities. Personally, I think if the micro-matters can also be handled by this way, then all of the states on Earth would grow positively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Online communication is becoming more popular than face to face communication Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a frog Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is sometimes said that the countryside does not offer a high quality of life especially for families Yet others opt to live and work in the countryside for its benefits What is your own view about this 80
- The flowchart shows the process of making jam Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...s can also be handled by this way, then all of the states on Earth would grow positively. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59104477612 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17945622047 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662686567164 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1792367676 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5789473684 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225282430506 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629316163761 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575569392427 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139053653913 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434414056441 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.