The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK, and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit.
The given line graph illustrates the travel to and from the UK by the UK and the overseas population over a period of two decades starting from 1979 to 1999, while the bar chart compares the most nations visited by the citizens in the UK in the year 1999.
Overall, as can be seen from the graphs, it is clear that an upward trend was witnessed in both visits being made to and from the UK. In addition, the citizens in the UK had a tendency to make a trip to France most in 1999.
Looking more closely at the line graph, in 1979, the number of trips abroad by UK residents was the highest, in the vicinity of 13 million, while the figure for visits to the UK was slightly lower, at around 10 million. After two decades, the number of abroad trips rose dramatically to roughly 53 million and remained the highest figure in the chart. Meanwhile, there was a gradual increase of 18% to approximately 28% in the figure for visits to the UK by overseas residents.
According to the bar chart, in 1999, the country taking the most trips by UK residents was France with roughly 11 million UK visitors, while the figure for Turkey was significantly lower, at only about 2 million UK visitors. At the same time, approximately 3 million and 4 million UK visitors made trips to Greece and the USA respectively. Additionally, there were roughly 9 million of the population in the UK making visits to Spain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-26 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | manjiinder_singh | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-01 | Jamjam23 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Hanabi | 77 | view |
| 2022-06-20 | mary.ssherr | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy used 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 and 1991 67
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50980392157 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59818645532 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486274509804 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2728787264 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.777777778 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345137013923 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150549014133 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831646178101 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224182397201 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505266383141 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.