In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
It is a widely known suggestion that transportation vehicles such as cars, buses, and trucks will no longer need drivers. Accordingly, visitors will be the individuals traveling inside these traffic vehicles. In this essay, I will argue why I believe that the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages.
To begin with, means of transportation that do not require drivers can increase the risk of accidents. Although technologies have been developed, they are still machines. Accordingly, these modern items will not be likely to detect dangerous situations while they are driving on roads, which may lead to severe accidents. Moreover, it would cost a huge amount to afford such a vehicle. Therefore, citizens will give up the idea of owning a driverless vehicle. However, there are certain factors that should be considered when it comes to the benefits of these vehicles.
In spite of the cons of these transports, I wholeheartedly believe that the pros will outweigh the cons mentioned. First off, it will be beneficial for people to have one of these vehicles due to their convenience. Indeed, drivers will not have to control transports by themselves; instead, they can sit still and enjoy scenery through the windows of these vehicles. Additionally, since these will be modern products, transports will be offered with the latest applications and technologies, which help with driving. Therefore, despite the expensive price, it is worth trying to purchase driverless vehicles.
In conclusion, there is a belief that driverless transportation will appear in the future, which means that there will be only passengers using vehicles inside. In this essay, I discussed why I am of the opinion that the benefits of driverless vehicles outweigh their drawbacks. Convenience and modern aspects are two superior elements, for my reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields but not in others Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society Those who choose to study less relevant subjects shoul 78
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Surgery products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3904109589 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04777589186 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547945205479 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0459855168 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5882352941 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1764705882 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420898794896 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126640179739 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977633704929 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277572130989 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080411941575 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.