The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and repairing the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graphs illustrates, the comparison of age groups of male and female got married in two different years (1996 and 2008) in one country. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, the highest percentage of males got married in the age of 25 to 29 in both years. Whereas, in 2008, the top most female marriage age was 30 to 34 which is two times higher than 1996.
Regarding the male age of 20 to 24 people got married approximately 6% and 3 % in 1996 and 2008 respectively. After the preferred age of 25 to 29, the marriage age ratio was declined to 7% ( 30 to 34 ) in 1996 which is 1% lower than 2008. In 1996, four percentage of 35 to 39 age groups got married, whereas, in 2008 which is about 5%. Similarly, age of 40 to 44, mere 2% in 1996 and about 3% in 2008 was the marriage age. Moreover, people getting married in 16 to 20 years was less than 1% in both years.
However, in 20 to 24 years married women was lower than 3% in both years. In 1996, females getting married in age of 25 to 34 was relatively stable with approximately 7%. In comparison, more than 10% of females got married in the age of 30 to 34 in 2008 which is decreased to 9% when it comes 35 to 39. Furthermore, females under the age of 44 getting married in about 5% and 7% in 1996 and 2008 respectively.
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many people think that museums will be replaced by technology as most information can be found free online Others believe that museums are still important Will museums no longer be needed in the future Is this a positive development 62
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- Some people think personal happiness is directly related to economic success while others believe this depends on other factors Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The bar graphs illustrates, the comparison of age groups of male a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ied in two different years 1996 and 2008 in one country. Units are measured in pe...
^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he marriage age ratio was declined to 7% 30 to 34 in 1996 which is 1% lower than...
^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e age ratio was declined to 7% 30 to 34 in 1996 which is 1% lower than 2008. In ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.19678714859 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56876312649 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.417670682731 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.647379613 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3846153846 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228235898333 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108644015968 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579187736966 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170656972161 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299892815471 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.08 11.4140731707 62% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.