The charts below provide information on popular modes of transport in the city of Cambridge for the years 2008 and 2018. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The pie charts illustrate compare on different variety of transport in Cambridge in 2008 and 2018.
It is clearly seen that in 2008 the most popular kind of transport was cars at 42% and by 2018 this number have been gradually reaching the lowest point in the chart almost in the half at 20%. In addition, the number of using busses from 2008 was at 30% and by the end of the pie chart have been slightly decreasing at 20%.
While, the figures of using ecological type of transport by start of pie chart was at the lowest point. In 2008 walking was the last kind of transport in the city of Cambridge at 11%. Nevertheless, in 2018 walking become the more popular type of mowing around the city and increase at 25%. Also, bicycles became the most useful kind of transporting in Cambridge and raised from 2008 which number was 17% to 2018 at 30%.
To sum up, these two charts we can notice that at start of pie chart the most popular transport were cars and busses and by the end of the chart trends have been changing. People became to think about ecological problems and started use more healthy type of moving such as walking or cycling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-13 | vanditaverma.v@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-06 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | view | |
| 2021-06-06 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 100 | view |
| 2020-10-28 | Rereirf | 75 | view |
| 2020-10-28 | Rereirf | 87 | view |
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts below provide information on popular modes of transport in the city of Cambridge for the years 2008 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 87
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money 61
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- There should be noise rules for people 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t have been slightly decreasing at 20%. While, the figures of using ecological type o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44761904762 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2832526427 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9927370601 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210742075061 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113919715729 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05053509391 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151629056016 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406978999155 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.