The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts shows the propotions of sodium, saturated fat and added sugars were eaten in the meal of the United States citizen.

In overall, it shows that the most of sodium and fat were eaten at dinner, while most sugar was used in snacks. Lunch also tended to be salty and fatty while breakfast has the lowest percentages for all three.

Dinner and lunch is similar, and have large proportions for both sodium (43% for dinner and 29% for lunch) and saturated fat (37% for dinner and 26% for lunch). In fact, the amount of sugar in a normal meal for dinner and lunch was at a much lower percentage 23% and 19%.

Turning to breakfast and snacks, they were both made up of 14% sodium. For saturated fats, snacks contained 21% and breakfast was lower at 16%. In terms of sugar, there was the greatest proportions at 42% of snacks and just 18% of breakfasts being made up of sugar.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-28 minhnhat2002 11 view
2024-03-28 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-01-04 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-11-10 Mayuresh0809 61 view
2023-10-10 MinyiChu 61 view
Essays by user Cao Quân Bảo :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
The charts shows the propotions of sodium, saturated fat...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 724.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49689440994 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21926082957 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540372670807 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6244131391 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0823885557543 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483333748647 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475310573737 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678282812946 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461667779756 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.