The media should limit how much bad news they report because it discourages people from doing activities which usually involve very little risk.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The negative information is increasingly popular in contemporary society. While I agree that social networks encourage people to do risky activities in a few aspects, I would argue that the media should not limit what they tell us.
There are several reasons why I believe that social media should limit bad news. Firstly, it may have a negative impact on readers such as it can affect their mental health by making them frightened. As a result, it influences their behaviour then they do not do it anymore. For example, some findings about the high crime rates in urban areas or plane crashes make the traveler feel anxious then they decide not to travel anymore, so this can lead to the reduction in economic growth. Secondly, bad information also can manipulate children. This can cause bad behaviours in them such as becoming rude or disrespectful to other people or it can make them always think in a pessimistic way.
However, I firmly convinced that the bad news should not be limited by the media. People have to decide and filter the news before they read it then they should take responsibility for what news they have read. Beside, for the safety of children's souls, the government or parents should caution them for not reading the negative information. Another reason why social networks should not do that is because they have a duty in providing full news for citizens to help them know what is happening and they can avoid doing it.
In conclusion, although I agree that bad information should be limited by the media because of a few reasons such as it can have a negative impact on readers, I am strongly convinced that social media should not do that because people should know and avoid bad news. It is recommended that the government should give the fine for extremely negative articles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-17 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | Trinh Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-20 | Kha Nguyen | 83 | view |
- The use of illegal drugs such as heroin and cocaine are becoming more and more common in many countries What are some of problems associated with drug abuse and what are some of the possible solutions 80
- Many crimes are often related to the consumption of alcohol some people think that the best way to reduce the crime rate is to ban alcohol Do you think this is an effective measure against crime What other solution can you suggest 67
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people think young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should be encouraged to work as car mechanics or builders etc to serve society Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a pessimistic way" with adverb for "pessimistic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...people or it can make them always think in a pessimistic way. However, I firmly convinced that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59933328578 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.02831821 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295905347581 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115269924617 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992883962372 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2130933374 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508515150924 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.